This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header


Burning for grouse alters upland stream ecology

30 April 2013, by Alex Peel

Burning patches of peatland to encourage grouse alters the UK's upland stream ecosystems, scientists say.

Peatland burning

The study, published in the Journal of Applied Ecology, says an influx of material from burnt peatlands affects water quality in some upland streams which, in turn, affects their biodiversity.

'In streams where burning has taken place nearby, higher sediment and organic carbon levels are associated with a decline in mayflies, stoneflies and other macro-invertebrate species,' says Dr Sorain Ramchunder, who led the study.

'Macro-invertebrates are an important part of the freshwater community. They are a good indicator of how clean the water is, and of the general health of the ecosystem.'

Grouse shooting is an important part of the upland economy, pulling in an estimated £190 million every year.

'Any regulation needs to be done with sensitivity, because grouse management is an important source of income in the UK uplands'
Dr Sorain Ramchunder

Older grouse prefer to shelter in taller heather, while the young feed on fresh shoots. To create a mosaic of habitats to suit those needs, land owners routinely burn patches of vegetation, while leaving others to mature.

Previous studies had focussed on the effect of burning on peatland carbon stores, amid fears that the practice might release long-stored carbon into rivers and the atmosphere, inflating the costs of cleaning water for use from the tap, and exacerbating climate change.

This study is the first to look at the effect of burning on stream health. Ramchunder and collaborators at the University of Leeds analysed water and macro-invertebrate samples from ten sites. Five were affected by burning, while the other five remained unburned.

In burnt catchments, they found higher levels of material being washed into the streams from the surrounding land. This, says Ramchunder, is not only damaging stream ecosystems, but could also have effects on birds that come to the river to feed on invertebrates.

But Ramchunder is anxious that any new measures to control burning take the economic needs of the uplands into account.

Male grouse

Male Grouse

'Any regulation needs to be done with sensitivity, because grouse management is an important source of income in the UK uplands,' he says. 'But the health of the ecosystem can have important economic implications too. The increasing cost of cleaning the water is just one example of this.'

Co-authors, Dr Lee Brown and Professor Joseph Holden, are now finalising the NERC-funded EMBER project, examining the effects of burning on soil hydrology and chemistry as well as taking a more in-depth look at river chemistry and macroinvertebrates.

Peatlands cover about three per cent of the Earth's surface and burning is common. In the tropics, local populations often rely on 'slash and burn' agriculture, where peatland is burned to make way for food crops.

A recent study showed that the destruction of tropical peatland forests was causing them to haemorrhage carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, raising concerns about their potential contribution to climate change.

Ramchunder SJ, Brown LE, Holden J, 'Rotational vegetation burning effects on peatland stream ecosystems,' (2013) Journal of Applied Ecology, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12082

Keywords: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.

Your comments

Crikey! Not only are the birds of prey being nobbled by people with game interests but so are the insects!I would question the economic value of grouse shooting given that so much of it (40% according to the Moorland Association) is not commercial. Glad I am not a salmon or trout man or I would be even more concnerned.

Jack Valiant, England
Wednesday, 12 June 2013 - 15:14


Social bookmarking:  ()