This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header


Bird eggs reveal urban pollution

9 August 2013, by Tom Marshall

Birds' eggs show just how serious a problem river pollution remains in the UK's former industrial heartlands, according to a new study.

Eurasian dipper (Cinclus cinclus)

Scientists analysed the eggs of Eurasian Dippers living in 33 rivers in South Wales, comparing the eggs of birds living along urban waterways with those of their rural peers. The city-dwellers' eggs contained large amounts of several harmful chemicals – in some cases four times higher than their country cousins, and approaching levels known to cause permanent damage.

Indeed, the team detected some of the highest levels of one particular class of pollutants ever recorded in songbirds. This means there could be risks not just to birds but also to people living nearby. The researchers say that testing bird eggs or blood samples could be a valuable addition to the methods water companies and regulators use to monitor river water quality, because of the way they illustrate wild organisms' real exposure to pollution.

The rivers of the Welsh valleys suffered severe pollution during the area's mining and industrial heyday; in the 1970s they were among Europe's most contaminated watercourses. Efforts to clean them up in recent decades have succeeded in cutting pollution from sources like factories, collieries and sewage works, aided by the decline of heavy industry.

But the cleanup hasn't gone nearly far enough. The scientists found large amounts of several pollutants, including some that are no longer being produced but are taking a very long time to disappear. And because the rivers are now generally cleaner, pollution-sensitive animals like salmon, otters, kingfishers and dippers are returning only to be exposed to potentially damaging chemical cocktails.

'The rivers of South Wales have seen major clean-ups since the 1970s as sewage treatment has improved and industry has retreated,' says Professor Steve Ormerod of Cardiff University, senior author on the paper, which appears in Environmental Science and Technology. 'This means, paradoxically, that clean-water organisms recolonizing these rivers, such as the dipper, are being exposed to new pollution problems whose effects are still poorly understood.'

The pollutants include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), both of which can stay around in the environment for a long time. Scientists think they can harm the health of organisms exposed to them in several ways, from hormonal imbalances to developmental problems in young animals. Current wastewater-treatment methods don't remove these chemicals.

Some significant pollutants aren't used any more and are now in decline - for example, dieldrin, which was once widely used in sheep dip but has since been banned. But comparing the results with measurements taken 20 years before reveals that others banned substances, like PCBs, are still present in increased concentrations in urban rivers; it may take many decades before they disappear naturally. Still others, including PBDEs, are still entering rivers from a variety of sources, from electronics to plastics and flame-retardant furniture.

The team was led by Dr Christy Morrissey, formerly of Cardiff University and now at the University of Saskatchewan. It also included other researchers from the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, the NERC Life Science Mass Spectrometry Facility at the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre in Glasgow and the universities of Exeter and Cardiff.

They are now trying to learn more about what pollution is doing to the birds, by monitoring their breeding success and physiology compared to their rural cousins around cleaner waters. Ormerod says much more work is needed to understand the toxic effects of these chemicals, particularly the still-increasing PBDEs, as well as exactly how they are finding their way into rivers and how long they will stay there. Early signs suggest that the birds' breeding success is suffering, though it is unclear why.

River birds have the advantage of integrating pollution from surrounding habitats. This means they might also be at greater risk from chemical pollution than other bird species, so monitoring them could provide early warning of wider environmental trends.

'For 30 years we've been using dippers as indicators of the health of upland rivers, and we know we can use them to detect everything from very specific point sources of pollution to patterns on a regional and intercontinental scale,' Ormerod explains. 'So they are a very valuable indicator species.'

In the longer term, studies like this will provide the information to support better regulation of the use and disposal of substances which could help us regulate sources of PBDEs and other chemicals more effectively.

Eurasian Dipper Eggs Indicate Elevated Organohalogenated Contaminants in Urban Rivers. Christy A. Morrissey, David W. G. Stanton, M. Glória Pereira, Jason Newton, Isabelle Durance, Charles R. Tyler, and Steve J. Ormerod. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (15), pp 8931-8939. DOI: 10.1021/es402124z

Keywords: , , , , , , , , ,

Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.

Your comments

Do these measurements involve egg destruction or is a non-destructive technique possible? If the former it hardly seems a good idea to encourage water companies and regulators to use the same approach - the BTO report a 36% reduction in dippers over the period 1995-2011. I assume the 30 year studies have been by observation?

Mike welch

Mike Welch, UK
Tuesday, 13 August 2013 - 15:14

Hi Mike - no, the technique does involve destroying the eggs. I asked Prof Ormerod about this, and he said the numbers of eggs involved aren't at all material from the point of view of the overall population, and that the team used abandoned or addled eggs whenever possible as well as fresh ones. But he added that if the technique were adopted more widely for water quality monitoring, it'd probably be a better idea to move towards taking blood samples from dippers and testiong those, rather than continuing to rely on eggs. This should avoid any damage to their reproductive success.

Tom Marshall, Planet Earth
Tuesday, 13 August 2013 - 16:03