Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Sea-level rise higher than expected

22 June 2009

Current carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere may commit us to sea-level rises of up to 25 metres, says new research based on a comparison of Antarctic ice temperature records with new sea-level data from the Red Sea.

Wave

The findings predict a sea-level rise much higher than the seven metres estimated by previous models and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The changes in temperature and atmospheric CO2 are well documented for the past hundreds of thousands of years. The same cannot be said about sea-level changes. 'Not much is known about long-term sea-level changes in response to global warming,' says Professor Eelco Rohling, from the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.

In a new report published today in Nature Geoscience, Rohling presents a new detailed record of 520,000 years of sea-level change, based on data collected from the bottom of the Red Sea.

'These real measurements from past times can be used as reality-checks for models, and this will help improve the quality of predictions for the future.'
Professor Eelco Rohling,
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton

The team analysed around 2000 foraminifer shells. Foraminifers are tiny organisms that have lived in the oceans for millions of years. By studying changes in the oxygen chemistry of the shells, the scientists can tell how sea level has in the Red Sea for the past 520,000 years.

The Red Sea is perfect for this kind of study because it has 'a very simple water cycle, with no major rivers running to it and only a narrow connection to the Indian Ocean,' explains Rohling.

The new record of sea-level changes matches Antarctic ice temperatures almost point by point - when the temperature goes up, the sea levels rise, when the climate cools down, ice caps expand and the oceans recede.

Because the link between temperatures and sea level has been clear in the past, differences in temperature can be used to predict future sea-level changes. 'We can assume that our observed natural relationship between CO2 and temperature, and sea level, offers a reasonable model for a future with sustained global warming,' says Rohling.

So what does the past tell us about the future?

The direct relationship between CO2 levels and global warming estimates a rise of up to 16°C in Antarctic temperatures over thousands of years for the current levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Rohling fed this data into his predictions for how sea level will change and found that the sea may rise a staggering 25 metres over thousands of years in response to this warming.

This value is much higher than the IPCC worst predictions of a rise of seven metres. 'Even if our 25 metres estimation is not absolutely correct, our findings suggest that the IPCC prediction is underestimated,' says Rohling.

The estimate of 25 metres sounds high, but it is in good agreement with independent data calculated for the Middle Pliocene. Back then, 3 million years ago, when CO2 levels in the atmosphere were similar to the ones we have today, the sea level was between 15 and 25 metres higher than it is now.

'These results show how important it is to develop not only models for the future, but to match that with developing detailed data for the past. These real measurements from past times can be used as reality-checks for models, and this will help improve the quality of predictions for the future,' says Rohling.


E. J. Rohling, K. Grant, M. Bolshaw, A. P. Roberts, M. Siddall, Ch. Hemleben and M. Kucera. Antarctic temperature and global sea level closely coupled over the past five glacial cycles. Nature Geosciences, published online 21 June 2009.


Keywords: , , , ,


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

The sea may well come up, but these currently fashionable numbers may interest:

Greenland ice melt: 250 cubic kilometres per year
Antarctic ice melt: 25 cubic kilometres per year

Groundwater pumping, 600-1,000 cubic kilometres per year.

As most pumping is in low recharge areas, a conservative guess is that half that water is going to the seas, via evaporation and transpiration. The figures are dated, and the real volume pumped is anyway higher, as pumping from rivers and lakes should be added.

My maths is not brilliant, but I think 500 is a larger number than 275. Why can one not get this curious set of numbers onto the table in this debate?
If interested, see this website.

Peter Ravenscroft, Closeburn, Queensland, Australia
Tuesday, 23 June 2009 - 10:39

I don't have a serious comment on these results, just a remark that it's amazing how often a picture of a wave (especially a beautiful surfing wave) is used to illustrate any article on climate change, although its totally irrelevant. How wave heights may change is a separate issue.

Judith Wolf, Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, UK
Monday, 29 June 2009 - 12:08

A Return to Phanerozoic Average Sea Level?

Might we be near the end of a large cyclical regression; not so different from Permian end regression? Statistically might it not seem more likely that we are due to revert at least towards an average of sea level for overall Phanerozoic, or even a further transgression? Might this be a natural underlying trend, independent of any superimposed anthropomorphic effect? Might we be headed for an Eocene/Paleocene world?

30 million years hence, what might our 'present' stratum (pl: strata) of say 10 million years look like? Might there be any evidence of mankind? For example, if we occupy the middle of such strata, then plus or minus 5 million years. For the past 5 million years, there was no effect. For the future 5 million years, transgression and Yellowstone's Western and Midwest repeated ash fallout would seem to reveal nature's dominant hand. For elevation of sea level to less than Cretaceous peak, most of southern U.S. would be inundated, and likewise for eastern coast. The Seaway would flood and enlarge Great Lakes into an inland sea. All coastal cities, and inland lake ports would become reefs initially, and then dissolution. Humanity would would once again be on the move. Therefore, might there be no evidence of mankind's handiwork in such strata (stratum); not even hard plastic cherts? So from a geological perspective, mankind's impact on the environment might be quite negligible, in comparison to nature's broader, deeper, more sustainable ways. Does our myopia greatly underestimate nature's scope and impact, in comparison to that of mankind's?

zanardm, usa
Tuesday, 6 October 2009 - 05:54

Share

Social bookmarking:  ()