Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Isotope analysis dates ancient Mexican

14 July 2009

After years of controversy, a new study shows that the skeleton of Mexico's Tepexpan Man is nearly 5,000 years old and lived on the shores of a tree-lined lake. Nowadays the lake has dried and the forests have given way to an arid landscape of cacti.

Skulls

Left: Late Pleistocene Mexican Paleoindian from Mexico City (12.755ka). Right: Early Holocene,Texcal Man, Valsequillo, Puebla (9.5ka).

The Tepexpan Man was first discovered in the late 1940s near the remains of mammoths, the extinct relatives of elephants that lived in Europe and North America during the Ice Ages. He was an adult male who died in his late twenties. Due to the close association with the mammoths, the skeleton was thought to be at least 10,000 years old and hailed as the 'oldest known Mexican'.

Years later, the bones were dated directly with radiocarbon methods and found to be only 2,000 years old. The Tepexpan Man lost its 'oldest man' status, but there was still work to be done.

Silvia Gonzalez grew up in Mexico fascinated by the story of the Tepexpan Man. Now as a professor of geoarchaeology at the Liverpool John Moores University, Gonzalez led a team to reconstruct the environment in which the Tepexpan Man lived and to revise the age of the findings.

The team used Uranium isotopes to date the skeleton and the results gave an age of about 4700 years. This means that the Tepexpan Man is still not the oldest Mexican, but the difference from the radiocarbon dating is remarkable.

'Back in the 1940s,' Gonzalez explains, 'archaeologists wanted to protect the skeleton from destruction, but the preservatives they used contaminated the bones:' the 2,000 years old given by the radiocarbon dating are an effect of the contamination. The Uranium dating, Gonzalez argues, is not affected by the preserving chemicals.

Tepexpan site

Silvia Gonzalez and David Huddart taking sediment samples at the Tepexpan site.

Past landscape

The team did more than just dating the skeleton. The Basin of Mexico is nowadays home to millions of people, so 'it's important to understand how the landscape and the environment changed over the last 20,000 years,' says Gonzalez.

To do this, Gonzalez and her colleagues analysed the sediments and fossils of a 4-metre-long core drilled on the now dry Lake Texcoco, near the site where the Tepexpan Man was first discovered. They analysed the sands, clays and volcanic ashes in the core and described fossils of diatoms, a type of microscopic algae, and tiny crustaceans called ostracods.

The sediments from the old Lake Texcoco tell a tale of environment change. When the Tepexpan Man was alive, the lake was deep and full of fish, with forest-lined shores. Today, the former lake area is in the outskirts of Mexico City, set in an arid landscape riddled with cacti.

But the area did not stay the same over the last 20,000 years. The level of Lake Texcoco oscillated numerous times and the type of vegetation on its shores changed accordingly. There were also several important volcanic eruptions which affected the lake. These environmental changes had a large impact on the prehistoric populations living by the lake shore, write the authors on the report published last week in Quaternary Science Reviews.

For Gonzalez this study highlights the importance of scientific methods to archaeology. 'It would not be possible to know how and when the Tepexpan Man lived without combining different scientific methods to address these questions.'


A.L. Lamb, S. Gonzalez, D. Huddart, S.E. Metcalfe, C.H. Vane and A.W.G. Pike. Tepexpan Palaeoindian site, Basin of Mexico: multi-proxy evidence for environmental change during the late Pleistocene-late Holocene. Quaternary Science Reviews, published online 3 July 2009. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.001


Keywords: , ,


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

What about the elephant's bones that are supposed to be 10.000 years old?

Roger Garcia-Marenco, Toronto, Canada.
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 - 22:15

The mammoth bones are embedded in lahar deposits (volcanic ash debris flows) and are infilling a gully very close to the Tepexpan Man discovery site. However this layer in not present at the site were the skeleton was discovered, just a few meters away. Helmut de Terra, who first found the skeleton, used a layer of caliche that is present in both sites to correlate them, but this is wrong because the caliche layer was formed much later on and it is a very discontinuous marker horizon.

Silvia Gonzalez, Liverpool, UK
Wednesday, 15 July 2009 - 12:11

I am intrigued that Tepexpan Man was found in close proximity to mammoth remains, even though his remains are not associated temporally with them. On a visit to Monte Alban, Oaxaca, Mexico several years ago I witnessed a remarkable stone carving exibited in the site museum. Carved into the atone slab was the depiction of a man with the head of an elephant (mammoth?).

brad schmidt, ontario canada
Wednesday, 15 July 2009 - 15:13

Any update about Valsequillo footprints?

Curro, Mexico
Thursday, 19 November 2009 - 02:39

Share

Social bookmarking:  ()