Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Tidal farms interfere with sea-floor sediments

24 July 2009, by Sara Coelho

Tidal energy farms may disrupt the natural balance of marine sediments. This can have positive or negative consequences for coastal environments and should be taken into account when deciding where to build such farms.

Bristol channel

The Bristol channel.

Tidal farms harness the energy of tides in a similar way to wind turbines, and are a possible source of renewable energy for a sustainable, carbon-free economy. But since tidal turbines operate underwater, they have the potential to interfere with marine dynamics and ecosystems.

Dr Simon Neill and Professor Alan Davies from Bangor University, and colleagues from Edinburgh University and Plymouth Marine Laboratory, designed a mathematical model to investigate how tidal turbines may affect the Bristol Channel estuary, which is being considered as a possible location for tidal generation.

They found that tidal turbines influence the natural transport of sands near the bottom.

Neill explains how: 'tidal farms remove energy from the environment. But if you take energy out, then there will be less energy available for moving sediments around. So sediment transport is weakened near the tidal farms.'

The findings, published last week in the Renewable Energy journal, also show that the effect is widespread. 'Transport is disturbed over a distance of 50km away from the turbines,' says Neill.

In practice, less transport means changes in the natural equilibrium of the coast, with unusual sediment accumulation near the tidal farm. At first, the changes will barely be visible, but after the 30-year life-cycle of a tidal farm they can add up to become significant. 'This can have positive or negative effects on the estuary,' says Neill.

More sand accumulating in the right spots may provide additional protection against coastal erosion and an extra resource of sand, gravel and other inert building materials.

But if sediments accumulate in the wrong places, waves might start breaking closer to the shore, which could increase coastal erosion and flooding. Neill adds that the consequences for bottom-dwelling marine animals are also unclear and 'only site-specific modelling studies could determine possible effects.'

The model also shows that the possible effects of the turbines on sediment transport depends on the pattern of local sediment transport pathways, not just the strength of the current at the point of energy extraction. This is especially true in the Bristol Channel, where shallow water and the interference of incoming and reflected tides creates complex sediment transport patterns.

'Our results suggest that, to minimise the effects of the tidal farms, the turbines should be placed in areas that lack local mobile sediment sources and have symmetric flood/ebb transport patterns,' says Neill.


S.P. Neill, E.J. Litt, S.J. Couch and A.G. Davies. The impact of tidal streamnext term turbines on large-scale sediment dynamics. Renewable Energy, available online 15 July, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.015


Keywords: , , ,


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

I am wondering whether there are any locations within the Severn Estuary that meet the criteria in the last para of the article.

Simon Bates, Exeter
Monday, 27 July 2009 - 10:06

There is a large region of Gravelly sand in the main channel between Swansea and Cardiff, a so-called bed load parting zone. Such zones exist because of flood/ebb symmetry and divergence of sediment transport. Since the tidal currents are less effective in transporting such coarse sediment, exploitation of the tidal streams in this region is likely to have minimal impact on sediment dynamics.

Simon Neill, Bangor
Wednesday, 29 July 2009 - 10:28

Share

Social bookmarking:  ()