Skip to main content
Main content

News

Shell beads point to dawn of modern human behaviour

25 August 2009

We often judge other people based on material possessions - the clothes we wear and the things we own can advertise our wealth, status and social allegiances. But when did we start using our belongings to tell others about ourselves?

Shells

Nassarius shells. Copyright: d'Errico/ Vanhaeren.

A new study by an international team of researchers from France, South Africa, Germany, Israel and the UK has confirmed that 80,000-year-old shell beads found in caves in North Africa represent some of the earliest evidence of the use of personal ornamentation.

The new research shows the shell beads were common across North Africa until they fell out of use around 70,000 years ago. Previously, the shells were known from only a few scattered examples. 'We are no longer looking at isolated or one off events.' says Professor Nick Barton of the University of Oxford, one of the authors of the study. 'We can now document the shells at a number of different locations in North Africa all of about the same age' he adds.

The beads provide evidence that the people alive at the time were acting much like modern humans. 'There is a problem with linking anatomically modern humans with behaviourally modern humans,' Barton explains. 'These people may have looked like us, but were they behaving the same?' he adds.

The presence of the beads suggests the people who made and wore them behaved in ways we would recognise. Using symbolic items like shell beads to communicate ideas about the wearer requires skills found only in modern humans, including a well-developed language and the ability to use abstract concepts.

The researchers analysed 25 beads from four sites in North Africa from the Middle Palaeolithic period. The beads, consisting of the shells of sea snails called Nassarius, had been transported some distance from the marine environment in which they're usually found, and showed evidence of deliberate alterations.

'We found evidence they had been strung together as in a necklace or bracelet,' said Barton. The shells had been deliberately perforated using stone tools and the researchers found distinctive wear patterns which suggested they had been rubbing together. Wear marks around the perforations indicated the shells had been threaded on a string. Several had also been covered with a pigment called red ochre and one shell showed evidence of heating, possibly to alter its colour.

The origins of fashion?

But what purpose did the coloured beads serve? 'What they were signalling, we're not entirely sure.' said Barton. 'Possibly they were an insurance policy, if you had shared access to certain resources and wanted to identify yourself to members of another group.' The beads may also have let wearers identify members of the same social group, preventing unnecessary conflicts.

Alternatively, the beads might have provided personal information about the wearer, such as the wearer's position in the social hierarchy, or that they had passed through puberty and into adulthood.

So do these beads represent the origins of today's fashions? Possibly not, according to the researchers. There is a gap in the archaeological record starting 70,000 years ago, during which no personal ornaments are found. They reappear around 20,000 years later, when humans are beginning to move out of Africa to colonise the rest of the world.

The researchers suggest the gap was due to climate change. As the world slid into another ice age the warm, humid North African climate dried out. As a result, human populations shrank, and cultural innovations such as shell beads may have been lost. Only with the expansion of the human population 20,000 years later were these cultural ideas rediscovered.

The work was partly supported through the RESET (Response of Humans to Abrupt Environmental Transitions) programme, which seeks to examine how climate change affected the evolution and adaptation of our ancestors.

The research was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'tools' menu on the right.


Your comments

It's good to remember that, when discovering fossils and ancient artifacts, the normal rules applying to bell curves are at work here. I.e. a fossil find probably comes from the top of the bell curve, the objects period of greatest existence. One can be pretty sure there was a vast period of shell bead making that is unrepresented in the fossil record.

It's also unwise to dismiss the possibility that the beads were simply aesthetic considerations and not socially significant. Or both.

If it is true that modern humans (the only critters that can be properly so called) arose some 200,000 year ago, it's probable that they arose pretty much complete as we are now. I think it's safe to assume that the arts started when we did.

Johan

Johan Mathiesen, Portland, OR
Wednesday, 26 August 2009 - 04:00

This find is significant for its numbers. Homo erectus showed some esthetic sense every now & then, putting a fossil shell in a hand axe or perhaps enhancing a rock that already sort of looked like a little person. Homo neanderthalensis may have done a bit more, even beginning to make necklaces with animal teeth toward the end. But regularly going out of one's way to collect inedible shells to make something decorative is a step beyond any of that and shows another level of esthetic sense – or thought. Perhaps even language. That's significant indeed.

Diana Gainer, Texas
Wednesday, 26 August 2009 - 17:38

Contrary to Johan Mathiesen's idea that Homo sapiens emerged 'fully formed', and that earliest representatives around 150-200,000 years ago were much the same as contemporary humans, the archaeological evidence suggests otherwise. The earliest evidence of behaviour such as using ochre as a colorant, or threading pierced shells for wearing as a body ornament begins to appear at least 50,000 years later than the earlist biological evidence of Homo sapiens. And it appears widely, from coastal South Africa to North Africa and outside Africa in northern Israel. Such behaviours increase in frequency in the archaeological record, and other new behaviours of symbolic significance also begin to appear. And the behaviours increase in complexity with time, also. Homo sapiens may have evolved with the cognitive potential for symbolising behaviours, but the realisation of that potential at first began very slowly, becoming an exponential curve that continues to our own time.

Trevor Watkins, Edinburgh, Scotland
Monday, 31 August 2009 - 22:57