Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Virus linked to bee colony collapse

8 October 2009, by Sara Coelho

A change in the behaviour of a bee virus may be responsible for honeybee colony collapses in Britain. The results are worrying but open the way to new strategies to protect bee colonies from disease.

Bee

Bee on clover.

Bee populations are declining all over the world thanks to colony collapses caused by viruses, parasites, bacteria, fungi or combinations of these. Because of the bees' crucial ecological role as pollinators and economic value as honey-producers, colony collapse has attracted the attention of many scientists, politicians and the general public alike. But a clear cause for bee decline is still elusive.

The tiny Varroa mite is a known bee parasite and is responsible for the transmission of many bee viruses. 'When a virus is spread by this mite, it's usually associated with a specific symptom, which gives the name to the virus,' explains Dr Declan Schroeder, a virologist at the Marine Biological Association in Plymouth.

So, the acute bee paralysis virus leaves bee workers paralysed, while the black queen cell virus kills young queen larvae. The deformed wing virus interferes with the development of workers who are born with malfunctioning wings.

Varroa mite

Varroa mite.

'We set out to look at the relationship, if any, between the viruses, the mites and honeybee colony health,' says Schroeder. To do that, the team sampled 15 bee colonies from England, all infected with several viruses and Varroa mites, as well as three colonies from the Scilly Isles, so far a disease-free area.

Schroeder and his colleagues collected twenty honeybees from each colony at different times during 2007 and 2008 and looked for genetic traces of viruses, while taking note of the degree of mite infestation.

Throughout the period of one year, four England-based colonies collapsed during winter, with no obvious trigger for their decline. 'The bees from these colonies showed no clear symptoms of disease,' says Schroeder. The collapsed colonies were also not infested by an unusually large number of mites.

So what happened? To figure out, the team looked at the amount of viruses in bees during the previous year. The results, reported online last week in the Applied and Environmental Microbiology journal, show that the bees from the four collapsed colonies had higher deformed wing virus loads during winter than the others.

'This is the first observed link between the abundance of a virus during a specific time of the year and over winter colony collapse, without Varroa mites being the cause,' says Schroeder.

Schroeder believes his team found evidence for a change in the behaviour of the deformed wing virus, possibly caused by a mutation.

'We are used to observe the deformed wing virus being transmitted by mites and causing clear symptoms,' he explains. 'Now the virus is implicated in colony collapse, with no obvious signs of disease and without the mites.'

It's not clear what is happening, but Schroeder suggests that the virus is interfering with the bees' behaviour, changing flight ranges, life span or even the queen's fertility, without the hallmark deformed wings. 'The individual bees may look healthy, but the colony as a whole is not,' he says.

'Now that we are aware that this virus is able to change behaviour, we can think of new strategies to protect colonies,' adds Schroeder.


A.C. Highfield, A. El Nagar, L.C.M. Mackinder, L.M-L.J. Noël, M.J. Hall, S.J. Martin and D.C. Schroeder. Deformed wing virus implicated in over-wintering honeybee colony losses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.02227-09


There are no keywords associated with this story.


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

This is promising research for which I hope they will get enough funding for so they can continue with their work. Beekeeping needs all the support it can get in the battle against declining colonies. Thank you

Henry Morris, Tavistock. Devon
Friday, 9 October 2009 - 22:36

This inference of a bee plague with an indication of virus transmission independent of Varroa infestation is a disturbing one, as is the possibility of rapid virus mutation within individual bee colonies in a single season. These disturbing findings point to the futility of any attempt to breed bees with resistance because the virus will always stay one jump ahead of the game as with the AIDS and influenza viruses. Consequently, reseach funds need to be carefully targeted at 1) finding out more about the viruses and their behaviour and 2) the way the original Apis cerana host of Varroa copes with them, which it must do given the lack of virulence observed in this sister bee species.

Dr David R Dixon, Chairman of CB Dennis Trust for Bee disease Research
Monday, 12 October 2009 - 11:27

Although there seems to be a relatioship between DWV (deformed wing virus) and a high level of varroa mites within a colony it is true this is not always the case and some colonies are more resistant to the virus than others either this is because they are healthier than other colonies is a question? But no real scientific work should be based on a very small/limited number of colonies as this can not give a bearing on the general bee population as there are many different strains of honey bee within the UK. Peter

Peter Folge, Knebworth, Hertfordshire
Thursday, 22 October 2009 - 18:23

When we first applied pyrethroids against varroa the kill rate of the mite was 99%+and I do not recall seeing evidence of DWV in colonies. Presumably at high rates of efficacy against the mite the virus had little chance to either propagate or mutate. Is the answer to strive for a return to these levels of control by stopping the use of Bayvarol and Apistan altogether for 5 years as it seems that after such a period varroa might lose its resistance to these compounds. Reintroduction of pyrethroids at that time could possibly break the infection cycle, but we would have more awareness of the possibility of resistance by misuse second time round and thus might strike against these viruses.

Jonathan Coote, East Sussex
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 - 13:11

Early summer I collected a swarm from one of my hives and housed it in an adjacent hive. The original colony has collapsed but the stock from it is strong. Any virus present would have traveled across with the swarm. I strongly lament the ban of Folbex, if used correctly was safer than a cigarette or crossing the road. There is nothing that will treat internal or external mites (the carriers of viruses),as efficiently as Folbex and perhaps it should be re-introduced to see if this helps fight the disaster that we bee keepers are experiencing.

David Taylor., South Wales.
Sunday, 8 November 2009 - 11:44

I was just surfing and found your blog. It really impressed me and I have bookmarked it. Keep posting as I am gonna come everyday for reading.

emergency ration packs, uk
Monday, 23 November 2009 - 09:36

The best 2 things that you can do as a beekeeper for the health of your bees is 1) Do not stress them out, Do not keep moving them about from crop to crop to Heather, I bet Pro-Rata more colonies are lost by large commercial keepers who stress their bees out by continual movement, than by jo bloggs who keeps a few hives here and there! And 2)Just declare war and exterminate as many Varroa Mites as you can. (SIMPLES!)

Andy Smith, Norwich, Norfolk
Monday, 30 November 2009 - 21:44

Share

Social bookmarking:  ()