Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Ozone hole has shielded Antarctica from global warming

1 December 2009, by Tamera Jones

The hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica has shielded most of the continent from global warming, say scientists in the first ever comprehensive review of the state of the Antarctic climate.

Ozone hole extent

The review, called Antarctic Climate Change and the Environment, is published today by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR). It concentrates on changes in the region over the past 30 years.

Drawing on evidence from 100 scientists from 13 countries, it specifically focuses on the rapid warming seen in the Antarctic Peninsula, changes in ice cover over the entire continent, the effect climate change has had on plants and animals in the region, atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and the differences between man-made changes and natural variability in the region.

Latest research

The review puts together the latest research from the icy continent, addressing urgent questions about Antarctic melting, sea-level rise and changes in biodiversity. It also suggests areas for further research.

The scientists who contributed to the review were surprised to find that the ozone hole has delayed the effect of rising greenhouse gas levels on the continent's climate.

'The most astonishing evidence is the way that one man-made environmental impact - the ozone hole - has shielded most of Antarctica from another - global warming,' says the lead editor of the review, Professor John Turner of the British Antarctic Survey.

Strong winds surrounding the continent have intensified as a result of the ozone hole and have effectively isolated the continent from the warming that's happening elsewhere on the planet.

'The most astonishing evidence is the way that one man-made environmental impact - the ozone hole - has shielded most of Antarctica from another - global warming.'
Professor John Turner, British Antarctic Survey

This means that over the last 30 years, there's been little change in surface temperatures over most of Antarctica, with the exception of West Antarctica. The east coast of the Antarctic Peninsula in West Antarctica has warmed rapidly during the summer months.

Stronger winds have led to other changes. Around 90 per cent of the glaciers in the West Antarctic Peninsula have retreated in recent decades and sea-ice extent west of the peninsula has decreased.

In contrast, since 1980 the extent of Antarctic sea-ice has increased by 10 per cent in the Ross Sea region, a deep bay on the opposite side of West Antarctica to the peninsula.

Loss of ice west of the Antarctic Peninsula has led to changes in the numbers of tiny marine creatures called phytoplankton, which are at the base of the food chain and play a crucial role in absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere.

Rapid warming along the western Antarctic Peninsula, along with a switch from snow to rain in the summer months, has led to plant, animal and microbial communities to expand in newly available land.

The scientists also say people have inadvertently introduced 'alien' organisms like grasses, flies and bacteria.

But they are concerned that the expected recovery of the ozone hole this century will make the full effects of greenhouse gas increases felt across Antarctica.

Human activity

The scientists also highlight that global CO2 levels are higher than they've ever been over the last 800,000 years. They say atmospheric levels of CO2 and methane are increasing at rates unlikely to have been seen in the geologically recent past.

Studies of sediments under recently lost ice shelves suggest ice shelf loss in some regions is also unprecedented over this time scale.

The scientists who contributed to the report maintain that human activity is linked to the changes they've seen in Antarctica.

Turner says, 'There is no doubt our world is changing and human activity is accelerating global change.'

But they hope that by integrating this multidisciplinary evidence into a single source, they'll help people who use the review understand the differences between environmental changes linked to the Earth's natural cycles, and those that are caused by humans.

The climate in the polar regions varies more than in other parts of the world, yet these remote regions are sparsely sampled. The researchers recommend that these regions should be monitored in much greater detail in order to detect changes.


Keywords: , , ,


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

The hole in Ozone is caused by the Polar Vortex and has been there for thousands of years.
During the winter/spring period, when the polar vortex is strongest, air outside of the vortex can not enter. So because the warm air from the mid latitudes cannot mix with the cold polar air, the polar air continues to get colder due to radiative loss of heat. When ozone in the vortex is depleted, it is not replenished with ozone rich air from outside the vortex. Not until late spring does the polar vortex weaken and eventually break down. After this the ozone is replenished and the hole closes.
The Arctic also has a hole but not on the same regularity as the Antarctic, the hole only appears in the Arctic with a polar vortex. Showing evidence the hole is caused by a polar vortex. The hole will be there for many thousands of years to come.
Nemo

Jon Nemo, Llanelli
Tuesday, 1 December 2009 - 13:27

The Polar Vortex has been present for thousands of years. The hole in the ozone layer has not - it has occurred due to anthropogenic emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) which destroy the ozone (O3) molecules.

According to Wikipedia, ozone is destroyed by the reaction with atomic oxygen:

O3 + O -> 2 O2

This reaction is catalysed by the presence of certain free radicals, of which the most important are hydroxyl (OH), nitric oxide (NO) and atomic chlorine (Cl) and bromine (Br). CFCs and similar chlorinated and brominated organic molecules have increased the concentration of ozone-depleting catalysts above the natural background.

The Polar Vortex merely contributes to the creation of the ozone hole in a globally ozone-depleted stratosphere.

According to the SCAR report "Strong winds surrounding the continent have intensified as a result of the ozone hole".

If you wish to assert otherwise, please state your credentials.

Again according to Wikipedia, ozone in the stratosphere is constantly produced, mostly from ultraviolet rays reacting with oxygen:

O2 + photon (radiation<240 nm) -> 2 O

O + O2 -> O3

The SCAR report also states that the ozone hole is expected to repair itself in about 50 years, now that the Montreal Protocol has curbed the use of ozone-destroying substances. The United Nations Environment Programme report states that "Assuming continuing compliance with the Protocol, it is estimated that the global ozone levels (60°S-60°N) will recover to the pre-1980 values around 2050. However, the future state of the ozone layer will be affected by multiple factors, including the abundance of ozone-depleting substances and climate change."

Again, if you disagree, please state your credentials.

ST, Brisbane Australia
Thursday, 3 December 2009 - 13:38

If the Ozone Hole was truly man made why is there not a hole appearing over say North America or China. If CFCs break down ozone in the lower stratosphere then there should be holes appearing all over and not just in the Antarctica and sometimes in the Arctic.
It is a chemical reaction on the surface of Polar Stratospheric Cloud particles that transform chlorine into a form that can be activated by sunlight. When the sun rises on the springtime Antarctic stratosphere, its light triggers a complex series of chemical reactions resulting in the destruction of ozone, inside the Polar Vortex.
Nemo

Jon Nemo, Llanelli
Thursday, 3 December 2009 - 14:10

But the atomic chlorine itself came from the CFC emissions.

The usual account of this is that the extreme cold temperatures in the Antarctic cause the polar stratospheric clouds you mention to form much more than elsewhere. CFCs break down in sunlight to form atomic chlorine, which reacts with ozone. The chlorine oxide this produces then reacts with more ozone to form oxygen and further atomic chlorine, which can then react again with yet more ozone.

The chlorine oxide also reacts with NO2, interrupting the cycle and stopping it breaking down further O3. But the polar stratospheric clouds catalyse the reaction between chlorine nitrate, the product of this chlorine oxide-nitrogen dioxide reaction, and atmospheric hydrochloric acid. This forms chlorine gas, which breaks down in sunlight to form atomic chlorine, which then breaks down more ozone.

So the argument as I understand it is that ozone depletion was indeed going on to some extent all over the world, but much faster in the Antarctic because of the PSCs, hence the ozone hole appearing there. There are well-documented measurements of its growth over the 1980s.

Tom Marshall, Editor, Planet Earth Online
Thursday, 3 December 2009 - 15:39

Share

Social bookmarking:  ()