Skip to main content

This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience. OK | Find out more

PEO header
Main content

News

Scientists move closer to predicting volcano hazard

18 May 2011, by Tamera Jones

UK and Russian scientists say they are a step closer to predicting how dangerous a volcano is after developing a method that lets them figure out how individual volcanoes are 'plumbed'.

Mt St Helens

The crater of Mt St Helens showing the active dome belching steam and volcanic gases.

The new approach means researchers need only analyse a single chunk of rock from a volcano to work out how big and deep its magma chamber is.

The same method also lets them calculate the length and width of the vent that brings the magma from the chamber to the surface.

Having both measurements is vital for predicting how hazardous a volcano will be.

'Generally speaking if a volcano has a big magma chamber and a narrow, short vent, the volcano tends to be more explosive than a volcano with a small chamber and wide vent,' says Professor Jon Blundy from the University of Bristol, a member of the research team.

'So, if we know the details of the plumbing system underneath a volcano, we're in a better position to say how dangerous it is likely to be,' he adds.

Being able to predict how hazardous a volcano is has long been the Holy Grail for volcanologists. But the size and depth of magma chambers underneath volcanoes varies hugely, and finding out the inner dimensions of individual volcanoes' plumbing systems has until now proved time-consuming, challenging and expensive.

'If we know the details of the plumbing system underneath a volcano, we're in a better position to say how dangerous it is likely to be.'
Professor Jon Blundy, University of Bristol

Now researchers at the University of Bristol and Moscow State University have developed a mathematical model that is cheap, safe and easy to apply.

It relies on a fact volcanologists have known about for some time: as magma moves from the magma chamber towards the surface, both crystals and gas bubbles form inside the magma. The rate at which crystals and bubbles grow depends on just how quickly the magma rises to the surface, which in turn depends on the diameter of the vent through which it travels.

'Magma from explosive volcanoes produces rocks with lots of bubbles in it, whereas rocks from volcanoes that ooze magma more slowly contain crystals of different sizes,' explains Blundy.

The researchers have taken this further: using their mathematical model they show that the range of sizes and types of crystal in volcanic rock also tells them about the plumbing for different volcanoes.

'Counting the size of the crystals gives us a window into the subterranean plumbing of a volcano,' says Blundy.

To test their model, the researchers applied it to a rock sample from Mount St Helens volcano in the US, which erupted in the 1980s.

Their model predicted a vent diameter of around 30 metres, connecting the volcanic crater to a magma chamber at a depth of around 14 kilometres. These predictions fit with other estimates using more traditional techniques like satellites or seismometers.

'The idea is to use this surprisingly simple and low cost technique in conjunction with some of the other methods to tell us about individual volcanoes' plumbing systems, that then inform our models of how volcanoes operate during eruptions,' Blundy says.

The study is published in the April 2011 edition of the journal Geology.


Oleg E. Melnik, Jonathan D. Blundy, Alison C. Rust and Duncan D. Muir, Subvolcanic plumbing systems imaged through crystal size distributions, Geology v. 39 no. 4 p. 403-406, First published online March 8, 2011, doi: 10.1130/G31691.1


Keywords: , , ,


Interesting? Spread the word using the 'share' menu on the top right.


Your comments

It is timely to note that emissions from volcanoes like coal fired power stations are part of the Carbon Cycle. Nox sox et al emissions become nitrogen sulphates for living matter to breathe and sequester along with CO2 where C4 vegetation converts such to O and the C becomes soil soil-carbon.
Your council can slow this ill-founded panic to stop coal burning energy when in fact at this point in time and research there is possibly only stoichiometric hydrogen yet to be perfected.
The Council could however point out that mass build up from whatever source can be sequestered(indeed offset) into C4 vegetation into deserts and like with much flow on benefits
Robert Vincin (see Google)

Robert Vincin, Sydney and PRC
Wednesday, 18 May 2011 - 23:20

Robert Vincin,
You appear to have got your facts in a twist.

a) it is known from ice-core studies and atmospheric measurements that CO2 is accumulating in the atmosphere at an increasing rate.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/CO2/graphics/Mauna_Loa_CO2.jpg

Luthi et al. High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record
650,000-800,000 years before present

Look at figure 2, for comparison, current CO2 levels are 393 ppm, see:http://CO2now.org/
You will see that CO2 levels in the last 800,000 years only reached 300 ppm once, around 300 ky ago.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7193/pdf/nature06949.pdf

b) It is known from isotope studies that the ratio of light carbon to heavy carbon in the atmosphere is declining, an indication that the excess CO2 is derived from fossil sources.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/CO2/iso-sio/graphics/isomlogr.jpg

c) It is known from the declining proportion of oxygen in the atmosphere that the extra CO2 is largely the result of combustion.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-coming-from-ocean.htm

d) Can you demonstrate any evidence for increased vulcanism that might explain the increased levels of atmospheric CO2?http://sks.to/volcano

e) The CO2 isn't coming from the ocean either, it's acidifying. http://www.skepticalscience.com/ocean-acidification-global-warming.htm

e) The amount of CO2 tallies well with the amount of fossil-fuels being burned.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/human-CO2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Hockey-stick-or-hockey-league.html

Amoeba, UK
Thursday, 19 May 2011 - 16:29